1962 Lloyd Tire Fitment Guide

1962 Lloyd vehicles use five different sizes across three models. The Alexander uses 4.25-15, the Arabella uses either 145R13 or 520-13, and the LT uses either 155R13 or 560-13. The Arabella and LT both work with 13-inch tire diameters, while the Alexander stands alone on a 15-inch application. Where rim-width guidance appears, 145R13 fits 4.00 to 5.00-inch rims, 155R13 fits 4.00 to 5.50-inch rims, 520-13 appears on 3.5 or 3.50 to 4.00-inch rims depending on product, and 560-13 spans 3.50 to 4.50-inch rims depending on brand.

That spread means year and make alone are not enough for a confident tire decision on a 1962 Lloyd. Start by identifying whether the car is an Alexander, Arabella, or LT, then confirm whether you want the model's bias-ply size or its radial alternative where both exist. Measuring the actual wheel before ordering is especially worthwhile on 13-inch Lloyd applications because the acceptable rim-width range changes from one size and product family to another.

On a 1962 Lloyd Alexander, 4.25-15 is a numeric bias-ply size. The first number refers to nominal section width in inches, so 4.25 indicates a relatively narrow vintage tire, and the 15 refers to the wheel diameter in inches. Unlike modern metric radials, this older format does not use the now-familiar slash-and-aspect-ratio layout. It belongs to a bias-ply era in which size markings were simpler and more closely tied to traditional vintage fitment practice.

That matters because a 4.25-15 should be understood as an Alexander-specific vintage-format tire, not as something interchangeable with the Arabella or LT's 13-inch sizes. If you are working from old sidewall markings, this decoding helps prevent an accidental jump into a modern metric size with the wrong wheel diameter. It also points you toward the right restoration path if keeping the Alexander true to its original period character is part of the goal.

On a 1962 Lloyd Arabella or 1962 Lloyd LT, 145R13 and 155R13 are euro-metric radial sizes. The first number is the section width in millimeters, the R identifies radial construction, and the final 13 is the wheel diameter in inches. Because no aspect ratio is written into these sizes, they are conventionally treated as 80-series metric radials. In this range, 145R13 belongs to the Arabella and 155R13 belongs to the LT, so the two are not direct substitutes even though both fit 13-inch wheels.

For a buyer, the key takeaway is that these radial sizes combine vintage-compatible dimensions with more modern construction than the bias-ply alternatives paired with each model. Reading the code correctly helps you avoid assuming that any 13-inch Lloyd tire is close enough. Width still matters, and so does the specific model, especially when checking wheel width, sidewall appearance, and how closely you want the finished car to reflect an early-1960s presentation.

For a 1962 Lloyd Arabella, the choice between 145R13 and 520-13 is mainly a choice between radial and bias-ply construction. The 145R13 radial comes in blackwall form from Michelin and Firestone, while the 520-13 bias-ply appears in blackwall and narrow whitewall versions from Firestone and Premium Sport. Both mount on 13-inch wheels, but they represent different periods of tire design and different visual results on the car.

Arabella owners who are building around a more original early-1960s look usually lean toward the 520-13, especially when whitewall styling matters to the finished appearance. Owners who expect more regular road use often prefer the 145R13 because it keeps the 13-inch fitment while moving into radial construction. The best next step is to confirm the actual wheel width and decide whether your priority is showroom-era presentation or a later-style driving feel.

Sidewall choices for 1962 Lloyd tires vary by size and model. The radial sizes, 145R13 and 155R13, are available as blackwalls. The Arabella's 520-13 bias-ply size appears in blackwall and narrow whitewall form, while the LT's 560-13 bias-ply size appears in narrow whitewall and wide whitewall form. The Alexander's 4.25-15 application does not have a sidewall-style comparison here against those 13-inch offerings.

That variety matters most when the visual finish of the car is part of the project. A blackwall radial gives the cleanest later-driver look, while narrow or wide whitewalls move the car more decisively toward a period presentation. For a 1962 Lloyd being prepared for shows or a historically faithful restoration, sidewall style can be almost as important as the size itself, so it is worth deciding on appearance before narrowing down brand and construction.

1962 Lloyd tire coverage comes from Michelin, Firestone, Premium Sport, Dunlop, and BFGoodrich. The Arabella's 145R13 radial is available from Michelin and Firestone, while its 520-13 bias-ply options come from Firestone and Premium Sport. The LT's 155R13 radial comes from Michelin and Dunlop, and its 560-13 bias-ply size comes from BFGoodrich and Firestone. Brand choice therefore changes with both model and construction type.

For most owners, brand selection comes after the bigger fitment decisions are already made. Once the model and size are confirmed, the real comparison becomes sidewall treatment, rim-width compatibility, and whether you want a radial or bias-ply casing. On a 1962 Lloyd, that means two Arabellas may not end up on the same tire family if one is restoration-focused and the other is driven more regularly.

Rim-width guidance for 1962 Lloyd tires depends on the exact size. The 145R13 radial fits 4.00 to 5.00-inch rims, and the 155R13 radial fits 4.00 to 5.50-inch rims. In bias-ply sizes, 520-13 appears on 3.5-inch and 3.50 to 4.00-inch applications depending on the product, while 560-13 spans 3.50 to 4.00-inch and 4.00 to 4.50-inch applications depending on brand. The 4.25-15 Alexander size does not add a wheel-width comparison here.

Those differences are a good reminder that wheel diameter alone is not the whole fitment story on a 1962 Lloyd. Two tires may both be 13-inch sizes and still ask for different wheel widths. Before settling on a radial conversion or a particular whitewall bias-ply, measure the actual wheel and compare it to the tire you are considering so the casing shape and footprint stay within the intended range.

Inner-tube requirements on 1962 Lloyd tires vary by size and product. The Michelin 145R13 and Michelin 155R13 radials carry TL tubeless marking, while other products in those radial sizes do not all state tube status the same way. The bias-ply 520-13 and 560-13 products also do not all carry the same explicit tube marking in their sidewall descriptions, so tube use should be confirmed against the exact tire and the wheel being used.

That makes wheel condition just as important as tire construction, especially on an older car. A sound tubeless-design tire still depends on a wheel that can seal properly, while some vintage wheel and tire combinations are better served with tubes. Before final setup on a 1962 Lloyd, check the exact sidewall marking on the chosen tire and make sure the wheel's design and condition support the way the tire is meant to be used.

On the 1962 Lloyd Arabella and 1962 Lloyd LT, the two tire choices for each model share the same 13-inch wheel diameter. That means the model's radial and bias-ply options are working from the same basic rim diameter, not from two entirely different wheel sizes. The Alexander is separate, using a 15-inch tire and therefore not sharing wheel diameter with the Arabella or LT.

Wheel diameter compatibility does not automatically settle wheel-width compatibility, which is why the final check still matters. A 145R13 radial and a 520-13 bias-ply may both fit the Arabella's 13-inch wheel diameter, but their acceptable rim-width ranges are not expressed in exactly the same way. The safest approach is to verify the wheel width on the actual car before switching construction types within the same model.

A 1962 Lloyd stores best in a cool, dry, dark space away from direct sunlight, electric motors, battery chargers, welders, and other ozone-producing equipment that can age rubber. Keep the tires clean, maintain inflation, and avoid leaving the car in one position for long stretches if possible. Bias-ply tires such as 4.25-15, 520-13, and 560-13 are more prone to temporary flat-spotting during static storage than the 145R13 and 155R13 radials.

If the car will sit for months, rolling it occasionally or supporting it in a way that reduces constant load can help preserve tire shape. Storage habits matter even more on low-mile collector cars because the tires often age out before they wear out. For a 1962 Lloyd that sees infrequent use, protecting the tires from heat, UV exposure, and long static loading usually does more for longevity than any mileage-based routine.

Tires on a 1962 Lloyd usually age out before they wear out, so time matters more than miles. A practical collector-car rule is to evaluate tires closely once they reach the five- to seven-year range and to treat the ten-year point as a serious replacement consideration, even if tread still looks healthy. The DOT date code on the tire identifies its age, and that date should carry more weight than appearance alone.

That principle applies whether your 1962 Lloyd runs on bias-ply or radial tires. A lightly used Arabella or LT may still have plenty of tread depth while the casing has already begun to harden, and an Alexander's vintage-style bias-ply can look serviceable long after age has become the real issue. Regular age tracking is one of the simplest ways to avoid trusting an old tire just because the car has not been driven much.

Tires on a 1962 Lloyd should be inspected before every drive and again before any longer outing. Look for sidewall cracking, tread separation, bulges, cuts, uneven wear, and signs that the tire is losing pressure between uses. If the car uses a setup that involves tubes, the condition of the valve stem and the wheel's inner surfaces also deserves attention, because those parts affect air retention as much as the outer casing does.

Frequent inspection matters on vintage cars because long periods of inactivity can hide problems until the first drive of the season. A tire that looked fine in the garage may reveal cracking, stiffness, or pressure loss once the car is moved and loaded. On a 1962 Lloyd, a quick walk-around before every drive is far easier than dealing with a failure after the car is already on the road.

A 1962 Lloyd Alexander would have been associated with a bias-ply tire in period, and the size tied to that model is 4.25-15. That combination matches the expectations of an early-1960s small European car from a make whose roots reached back into postwar economy transportation. While bias-ply construction is historically appropriate here, original-market details could still vary by region, equipment level, or later owner changes over the life of the car.

For a restoration, the practical takeaway is to begin with the correct size and construction type before worrying about finer appearance details. If the car is being judged or restored to a very specific delivery standard, confirm period references through Lloyd marque specialists or club resources. That extra step helps separate a generally correct vintage fitment from a truly market-specific one.

Correct tire fitment matters on a 1962 Lloyd because judges and knowledgeable enthusiasts often notice size, construction type, and sidewall presentation immediately. An Alexander on a modern-looking radial conversion, or an Arabella or LT wearing a sidewall style that conflicts with the intended period look, can change the visual impression of the whole car. On era-sensitive restorations, those details are part of authenticity rather than mere decoration.

For show use, the right approach is to match the tire not only to the model but also to the story you want the car to tell. A factory-style restoration usually calls for closer attention to bias-ply construction and era-appropriate sidewall appearance, while a touring-oriented car may reasonably trade some originality for drivability. Event rules vary, so club guidance and marque-specific judging standards are worth checking before a concours-level presentation.

For the 1962 Lloyd Arabella's 145R13 radial size, Michelin XAS-FF and Firestone F560 Radial share blackwall styling and radial construction but differ in sidewall-marking detail and published specifications. The Michelin carries a 145HR13 74H TL marking and weighs 18 pounds, while the Firestone appears as 145R13, shows a load figure of 825 pounds at 44 psi, fits 4.00 to 5.00-inch rims, and weighs 12.7 pounds. Both stay within the same 13-inch radial fitment family.

That means the choice is less about whether one fits a 1962 Lloyd Arabella and more about which specification profile suits your priorities. One owner may value the Michelin's explicit H-rated, tubeless-marked sidewall, while another may focus on the Firestone's published rim-width and load information. When two tires occupy the same size category, comparing the exact sidewall marking and wheel-width compatibility is often more useful than comparing brand names alone.

1962 Lloyd tires can be suitable for highway use when the correct size, condition, and inflation are all in order. The radial 145R13 and 155R13 examples here include H speed ratings, which carry a 130 mph ceiling, while the bias-ply sizes are vintage-style constructions that should be driven with the expectations appropriate to an older tire design. In normal collector-car use, the vehicle's own braking, suspension, and overall mechanical condition are usually a more realistic limiting factor than the raw speed symbol on the radial tires.

The practical question is not whether a 1962 Lloyd can touch modern interstate speeds in theory, but whether the entire car is ready for sustained road use. A healthy tire on a poorly sorted vintage chassis is still not a sound road setup. Before any highway trip, make sure the tire type matches your intended use, then treat the car as a complete system rather than judging safety by tire size alone.

Inflation pressure for a 1962 Lloyd depends on the exact tire size and product. Published figures include 825 pounds at 44 psi for one 145R13 radial, 770 pounds at 32 psi and 1100 pounds at 60 psi within 520-13 offerings, and 850 pounds at 30 psi for 560-13 products. Those figures are tire ratings rather than universal vehicle settings, so they should not be transferred from one size to another or treated as a blanket recommendation for every 1962 Lloyd model.

The best practice is to start with the factory vehicle recommendation from the owner's literature, then compare it with the reproduction or replacement tire's own rated pressure information. That is especially important on a mixed range like 1962 Lloyd, where one model uses a 15-inch bias-ply and the others split between 13-inch bias-ply and radial options. Correct pressure is always size- and tire-specific, not just year-and-make specific.

Before a longer drive in a 1962 Lloyd, inspect each tire for cracking, cuts, bulges, irregular wear, and proper inflation, then check that every valve stem is sound and that the spare is usable. Pay extra attention to any older bias-ply tire for signs of age-related stiffness or flat-spotting after storage, and confirm that the wheel and tire combination is appropriate if the car has been converted between bias-ply and radial construction. A longer trip is also the wrong time to discover a slowly leaking tire.

Tire checks should be part of a broader vintage-car routine that includes brakes, wheel bearings, steering, and basic fluid and charging-system inspection. A 1962 Lloyd is a small, light car from an earlier motoring era, so reliability depends on many little details working together. Giving the tires a careful inspection first is one of the quickest ways to reduce risk before the rest of the mechanical systems are put under sustained road load.