1982 Nissan 310 Tires

The 1982 Nissan 310 uses two primary radial tire sizes: 155R13 and 165/70R13. Both sizes are associated with this model, and both use a 13-inch rim diameter. The Deluxe and GX sub-models share these same two fitment paths, so the main question is which of the two sizes matches the wheels and setup on the car being serviced.

That means tire selection starts with a quick confirmation at the car itself. Check the current tire sidewall, verify the wheel diameter, and account for any wheel changes made over the years. Since both sizes belong to the same model range, choosing correctly is less about trim name and more about matching the actual wheel-and-tire combination now on the vehicle.

The tire sizes associated with the 1982 Nissan 310 both use a 13-inch rim diameter. That applies to 155R13 as well as 165/70R13, so the wheel diameter remains consistent even though the tire sizing format differs. In practical terms, the key distinction is the tire size itself rather than a change in rim diameter between fitment options.

Wheel width still matters, especially when comparing actual tire products. A 13-inch wheel can exist in more than one width, and that affects how comfortably a given tire works on the rim. Looking at the wheel stamp, checking the existing tire size, and comparing the product’s rim-width guidance will help avoid choosing a tire that does not suit the wheel already on the car.

The covered 1982 Nissan 310 sub-models share the same two tire sizes. Both the Deluxe and GX are associated with 155R13 and 165/70R13, and both fitment paths use radial construction on 13-inch rims. There is no separate Deluxe-only or GX-only tire size within the fitment range shown for this model year.

That shared fitment narrows the search, but it does not eliminate the need to inspect the actual car. A vehicle may still have different wheels than it left with decades ago, and older compacts are often updated with replacement rims. The most dependable approach is to confirm the current wheel diameter and installed tire size before settling on a replacement.

Start with the basics: correct size, radial construction, and compatibility with the car’s 13-inch wheel. For 155R13 on a 1982 Nissan 310, the available options center on blackwall radials from Michelin and Dunlop, so the choice is more about tire series and intended presentation than about switching between very different sidewall styles.

It also helps to compare the wheel itself against the product’s rim-width guidance. A period-style restoration may lean toward a traditional Euro-metric look, while a regularly driven car may simply need a properly matched radial in the correct size. Once size and wheel compatibility are confirmed, comparing brand, series, and general visual character becomes the more useful next step.

Michelin and Dunlop offer applicable products for the 1982 Nissan 310 in the 155R13 fitment shown here. The Michelin option appears in the XAS-FF family, while Dunlop is represented by the SP Sport Aquajet series. Both are radial, 13-inch, blackwall tires, so the brand decision sits within a fairly focused vintage-appropriate small-car tire category.

That makes brand comparison more about the tire family and the style of replacement you want than about radically different fitment types. Owners who want a traditional European-style radial presentation may focus closely on series character, while others may simply want the correct size from a recognized vintage tire brand. The better choice is the one that matches the car’s actual setup and use.

The applicable 155R13 products for the 1982 Nissan 310 include the Michelin XAS-FF and the Dunlop SP Sport Aquajet series. Both are radial blackwall tires for 13-inch wheels, but they represent different vintage tire lines rather than duplicate labels on the same casing. That gives buyers a meaningful series-level comparison within the correct size range.

Series choice matters most when the goal is to match the visual tone and intended use of the car. Some owners place more emphasis on period-style appearance, while others simply want a quality radial in the proper format for road use. Keeping the focus on the correct size first prevents a tire-series preference from leading to an avoidable fitment mismatch.

A period-style 1982 Nissan 310 usually starts with the correct 13-inch radial fitment and the tire size that matches the car’s actual wheel setup, either 155R13 or 165/70R13. Within the available product range shown here, 155R13 offers traditional blackwall radial choices from Michelin and Dunlop, which suit the clean, understated look many early-1980s compacts wear well.

Appearance should be balanced with accuracy and practicality. If the goal is close historical presentation, confirm the car’s existing wheel-and-tire combination and compare it with period photos, brochures, or marque-club guidance before choosing a series. That extra step helps avoid selecting a modern-looking substitute when a more era-appropriate radial format would better support the restoration.

Correct tire fitment matters because it affects both the look and the stance of a restored 1982 Nissan 310. Using the proper 13-inch radial format helps the car retain the visual proportions expected of an early-1980s compact, whether the setup calls for 155R13 or 165/70R13. Tire choice also influences how authentic the finished presentation feels from curbside.

A restoration-minded owner should check more than the size printed in a catalog. Wheel diameter, wheel width, and the tire’s sidewall profile all contribute to how the car sits and fills the wheel opening. Even small changes can alter the character of a lightweight compact, so choosing with both fitment and appearance in mind usually produces a more satisfying result.

Yes. A 1982 Nissan 310 may be associated with 155R13 and 165/70R13 on 13-inch rims, but aftermarket wheels, suspension changes, or body alterations can change what works on the car. Even when the rim diameter stays at 13 inches, wheel width, offset, and available clearance can shift enough to influence which tire size is the better match.

That is why the actual setup on the car matters more than assumptions based on model year alone. A quick check of wheel dimensions, current tire size, and clearance at the fender and steering range can prevent problems after installation. Older compact cars are often modified over time, so fitment should always be confirmed against the vehicle as it sits today.

Before putting a 1982 Nissan 310 into regular use on new tires, inspect the wheels, valve stems, and general suspension condition along with the tires themselves. The wheel should match the tire’s 13-inch diameter and suitable width, and the tire should be seated correctly with no visible rubbing or clearance concerns at full steering lock.

Road readiness also depends on the rest of the car. Check inflation, lug torque, signs of uneven wear after the first miles, and any vibration that may point to balance or wheel issues. On an older vehicle, it is smart to look over shocks, bushings, and steering components at the same time, since fresh tires can reveal problems a worn set was masking.

155R13 tires on a collector 1982 Nissan 310 should be maintained with regular pressure checks, visual inspections, and occasional movement of the car if it spends long periods parked. Because collector cars often see limited mileage, age and storage conditions can matter as much as tread wear. Sidewall cracking, bulges, cuts, and slow air loss deserve attention even on lightly used tires.

Storage habits make a real difference on a small classic radial. Keeping the car out of prolonged sun, excessive heat, standing moisture, and ozone sources helps preserve the tires over time. It also pays to inspect the tires before longer drives rather than assuming low mileage means low risk, especially on a vehicle that may sit for weeks or months between outings.